by Dr. Larry Wortzel and Mr. Dean Cheng, The George C. Marshall Institute, The Washington Roundtable on Science and Public policy, November 28, 2006

China is quickly becoming a major actor in outer space. Its highly publicized exploration program and its commercial prowess are indicators of growing means and interest in space activities. This discussion explores China’s military goals and intentions in space as well as its technological capabilities. It also considers the means and measures needed to counter these prospective Chinese threats and protect the United States’ strategic advantages and security in space.

Dr. Larry Wortzel, Colonel, US Army, (Ret.) is a leading authority on China, Asia, intelligence issues, foreign policy, national security, space policy, and military strategy.

Mr. Dean Cheng tracks Chinese military and technology issues at the CNA Corpora-tion’s Project Asia.

Download China's Military Policy in Space

Pdf format, 221kb, 28pages

Visit China's Military Policy in Space Official Website

The George C. Marshall Institute, a nonprofit research group founded in 1984, is dedicated to fostering and preserving the integrity of science in the policy process. The Institute conducts technical assessments of scientific developments with a major impact on public policy and com-municates the results of its analyses to the press, Congress and the public in clear, readily understandable language. The Institute differs from other think tanks in its exclusive focus on areas of scientific importance, as well as a Board whose composition reflects a high level of scientific credibility and technical expertise. Its emphasis is public policy and national security issues primarily involving the physical sciences, in particular the areas of missile defense and global climate change.

The Washington Roundtable on Science and Public policy is a program of the George C. Mar-shall Institute. The Roundtable examines scientific questions that have a significant impact on public policy and seeks to enhance the quality of the debate on the growing number of policy decisions that look to science for their resolution.

Comments (0)

Name

Email

Comment

smaller | bigger

Add Comment