Last shall be First: A field study of biases in sequential performance evaluation on the Idol series |
| Document - Paper | |
| April 11 2008 | |
|
JEL codes: D81, Z1 We frequently make judgments and decisions about information which is presented to us in a sequential manner. This in particular is the case when we have to quickly assess the performance of individuals within a pool of contestants: job interviews, singing auditions, political debates, or even dating evenings. The psychological literature suggests that sequential presentation of information may in uence the way each piece of information is processed and recorded. Studies in economics (Neilson 1998) and marketing (Novemsky and Dhar 2005) have also found that a choice in a situations of sequential choices may be dependent of the history of the sequence. This issue is of special importance for situations of performance evaluation. If there is any effect of the order in which people are assessed on the final evaluation of individual performances, it means that the evaluation process is biased. Stated simply, what should be completely irrelevant information (the passing order) plays a significant role in the evaluation process. ... PAPER, PDF FORMAT, 282KB, 21PAGES. Lionel Page Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|
| Last Updated ( April 11 2008 ) | |
| < Prev |
|---|
Lots of FREE books & magazines delivered directly to your e-mail inbox!
| Profit Magazine |
| Aerospace Manufacturing and Design |
| Beverage World Magazine |
| Hydrocarbon Processing |
| Supply & Demand Chain Executive |
| NASA Tech Briefs |
| Nature Biotechnology |
| Renewable Energy World |