Asiaing.com

Wednesday
Dec 03rd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home arrow Blog arrow Magazine's Blog arrow Refugees Magazine, December 2007

Refugees Magazine, December 2007

Magazine - Refugees Magazine
Wednesday, 12 March 2008

Refugees Magazine, December 2007Refugees magazine is the quarterly magazine of the Office of the United Nations  High Commissioner for Refugees, which is mandated to lead and coordinate international action to protect refugees and resolve refugee problems worldwide. It reports on UNHCR activities and related news and includes profiles.

4 Cover Story
States are having increasing difficulty distinguishing between refugees andmigrants.

12 WORSE THAN THE SHARKS
The smugglers operating between Somalia and Yemen are among themost vicious in
the world.

15 MALAWI’S DILEMMA
Many refugees andmigrants only stay for a short while beforemoving on to South Africa.

16 THE DEEP BLUE SEA
Anti-immigration policies, reckless smugglers and cold commercial calculationsmay be
endangering lives at sea.

22 CARIBBEAN CONUNDRUMS
Every year, thousands fromwithin the region – and beyond – try to reach the US
via the Caribbean.

23 MIGRATION TO THE NORTH
The route viaMexico to the US is fraught with risk for refugees andmigrants alike.

25 CONTROL VS . PROTECTION
Within the EU, there has been amarked shift of focus fromprotecting refugees to halting
irregularmigration.

29 DIVERTED TO NAURU
How different treatment, based on the way people arrive, became a central feature of
Australia’s asylumpolicy.

31 IS TOLERATION ENOUGH ?
Relatively few Asian countries have established formal asylumsystems.

Download Refugees Magazine, December 2007

PDF format, 2.7MB, 32Pages.

ISSN 0252-791 X

Front cover: Coastguards rescue amigrant or refugee off the coast of southern Spain.
©REUTERS / A. MERE S / E S P • 2002
Back cover: Somemigrants and refugees are killed, or badly injured, attempting to
cross borders.
©S ERGIO CARO / MAR• 2005

View Refugees Magazine, December 2007

Online (HTML), Full & free.

The Editor's desk
Refugee or migrant?

In the case of the man on the cover of this magazine, at the moment when the picture was taken, the question was irrelevant. Whoever he is, he deserved to be saved – precisely what the coast guards were trying to do after a boat of would-be migrants overturned off the coast of Spain, drowning several of its occupants including two pregnant women.

However, once he was safely on shore, the question of whether he was a refugee or a migrant may well have come immediately to the fore.

As a refugee, fleeing persecution or armed conflict, he would have been entitled to "international protection" in an asylum country – in this case most probably Spain. On the other hand, if he was someone moving for financial reasons – to earn a better living than he could at home – then he would be classified as an economic migrant, and would quite likely be sent back to his home country.

This is a judgement that many countries around the world make in varying numbers of individual cases every day.
Migration controls are making it hard for refugees to find safety.

Sometimes the decision is relatively straightforward, and sometimes it is an extremely difficult call to make. There are countries that produce lots of economic migrants, and very few refugees. But they do produce some, and it is the job of asylum adjudicators to spot them. There are asylum seekers without documents who are refugees, and there are asylum seekers with valid travel documents who are most definitely not. There are people who articulate a false story well, and people who articulate a true story badly – or not at all (because it is too painful and too personal).

And there is a grey zone: people who are leaving a country where persecution and discrimination are unquestionably occurring, and the economy is also dire. Are people leaving such countries for refugee reasons, or economic ones – or do both sets of reasons fuse into one that is, in many cases, almost impossible to unravel?

And what about the people who leave their country for refugee reasons, and then keep on moving for economic ones (so-called 'secondary movers')? Whether or not their onward movement is justified may depend on what lies between their country of origin and the country where they eventually make their asylum claim.

There is, of course, nothing new about people moving. Migrations of people for both refugee and non-refugee reasons have been taking place since before the beginning of recorded time. And if we were to trace our ancestors back far enough, all of us would find that we originated somewhere else.

Nor should voluntary migration – economic or otherwise – necessarily be viewed as negative (even though it is usually seen that way). Migrants often fill the gaps in the workforce, rather than take other workers' jobs – but they still make the perfect scapegoat for a society's ills, and their contribution is often hidden or ignored.

The linked issues of migration and asylum are probably more widely debated (and confused) today than ever before: perhaps because the number of people on the move has increased; perhaps because the planet – or certain countries on it – feel overcrowded; perhaps for a host of other reasons, both real and imagined.

And, as the 21st century progresses, it is likely to become even more complicated, with more people forced – one way or another (war, economics, climate change) – to pull up their roots and move somewhere else.

Over 200 million people are believed to be living outside their original homeland already. Relatively few of them are refugees. But, yes – taking the trouble to find out which ones are does still matter.

To undermine the system that identifies a refugee, and prevents him or her from being sent home, would in some cases be like the coastguards in the cover photo cutting the rope instead of hauling it in. It should be unthinkable – and it is unthinkable, when one looks at asylum seekers and refugees as individual human beings.

But when they are reduced to statistics, and described in pejorative terms such as 'floods,' 'waves,' 'unstoppable tides' (and other watery metaphors that bear a certain tragic irony given the number of would-be refugees and migrants who drown), they are all too easy to cast aside and ignore.

Visit UNHCR Official Website

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees was established on December 14, 1950 by the United Nations General Assembly. The agency is mandated to lead and co-ordinate international action to protect refugees and resolve refugee problems worldwide. Its primary purpose is to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees. It strives to ensure that everyone can exercise the right to seek asylum and find safe refuge in another State, with the option to return home voluntarily, integrate locally or to resettle in a third country.

In more than five decades, the agency has helped an estimated 50 million people restart their lives. Today, a staff of around 6,300 people in more than 110 countries continues to help 32.9 million persons.

Comments (1)add comment

Speed said:

Thnx a lot!
March 16, 2008

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy
 
eBooks, free eBooks
 
 

Zinio Magazines

Enter your email address: