Towards a Liberal Utopia?
|
|
Ebook -
Economics
|
|
Towards a Liberal Utopia?
Edited by Philip Booth
Institute of Economic Affairs (February 09, 2005)
In this, the IEA's fiftieth anniversary special, numerous
commentators and IEA friends reflect on the prospects for liberty over
the next fifty years.
Official Site Download (Pdf , 605Kb)
Socialists have never been shy of sketching out their dreams of a
better world, but that better world has never materialised in socialist
countries. Indeed, socialism has frequently achieved the precise
opposite of what was intended by its architects.
The first part of Towards a Liberal Utopia?
outlines the dreams of liberal economists and political scientists.
These are not the dreams of people who wish to achieve their plans
through central direction and who believe they know the precise outcome
of the process called liberalisation. Rather our liberal thinkers
sketch out frameworks for policy, which, in increasing the domain for
individual action, will give rise to beneficial results that cannot be
foreseen in detail. This will not lead to utopia, but the authors are
confident that greater freedom will lead to better and more prosperous
society.
The second part of the book shows how an earlier
generation of liberal economists turned ideas into action. Led by Ralph
Harris and Arthur Seldon, the authors writing for the Institute of
Economic Affairs helped to turn back the tide of collectivism by
undermining its intellectual foundations. They were so successful that
no serious political party now proposes a platform of central planning.
As the authors featured in the first part of the book make clear,
however, that does not mean that there are no new dragons of
collectivism to slay. Some battles may have been won, but the war of
ideas continues.
Towards a Liberal Utopia? is essential
reading for all those who are curious to know how the liberal economic
agenda will develop over the coming generation.
‘I trust you get some satisfaction from how far the influence of the IEA has spread, directly and indirectly.’ Milton Friedman, 6th October 2004
|